@edsu One thing that’s always baffled me about this is that the underlying tech *is* neat — it’s a novel solution to the “Byzantine generals” problem, which is a longstanding “hard thing” in CompSci. It’s all just *terribly* suited to anything like a currency.
All the stuff around DAOs has a “maybe there’s something there?” Feel to it because it is actually about decisions and consensus. But everyone involved is so tied up in the rest of the crypto trash I’m happy to just ignore for now.
@a like you said it is easier, and healthier, to just ignore it, and not expend the energy sifting through it all to find what is worthwhile. It's not clear to me that what is actually worthwhile will survive, but I guess it will?